It doesn’t take much these days to feel a crushing burden of confusion as one looks at the political landscape. One need only look at the limited choices we have in our “representative” government, designed to have the will and opinions of all people voiced publicly. Yet, the more I try to study the issues and candidates, the more I’m baffled at what chipping away the varnish reveals: this is all pre-fabricated spin. I can’t just blindly choose to vote for one party or the other when I know that more than half the time, they’re both wrong. Is it really right to vote for the lesser of two evils (doesn’t that philosophy admit to voting for evil)?
Reading the Bible through the lense of politics reveals a dangerous problem: the Bible is very political. Consider these Old Testament occurrences:
- God orchestrated a political revolution with millions of workers walking out of government jobs and becoming immigrants (bailing out of their lifelong contracts)
- God had a group of millions of people march towards cities and declare a literal war on other humans to establish borders
- God warned the Jews to take care of the aliens in their borders (illegal immigration commentary, anyone?)
- God authorized humans being removed from their communities for sins of certain degrees
- God was against the election of one person to serve as a monarch
What about the New Testament. This one is worse.
- Mary’s song about her Son said things like “He put down those in the upper seats and lifted up those below,” and “he filled the hungry with good things and the rich he sent away empty”
- There were four main political parties on the scene when Jesus emerged. Jesus chose sides with none of them.
- A woman faced capital punishment for being caught cheating on her husband sexually with another. Jesus opted not to bring about the punishment.
- A wealthy man asked Jesus what to do if he’s followed all of God’s commandments. Jesus told him to sell everything he has (his oxen, his house, his stock, his Hummer, his mansion, his condo) and give it to the poor.
- Some of Jesus’ opponents wanted to ask Jesus about paying taxes. He told them to give the government what it asks, but also give Him what He asks.
- The “Gospel” was a term the Roman government used to designate its success in fixing the world. Sort of like saying Rome was bring “Change.” The disciples hijacked this term and used it for themselves. Country first? How about “Kingdom First.”
- Jesus said its easier for a camel to walk through the eye of a needle than for a person of great wealth to experience His Kingdom. It makes me wonder which Kingdom Wall Street lives in.
- Roman emperors were designated as “Saviors.” Proclaiming that a “Savior is born unto us” was like saying, “A new, better President has been born.”
- Caesar was known for riding a steed into town for a parade with people waving. Jesus did a similar action (with a smaller crowd) and on a humble donkey.
- King Jesus was assassinated for his admission that He believed he was the King of the Jews. This was a politically charged statement, like telling Fidel Castro that the real leader of Cuba is a plumber from a small village.
- Jesus was known to have crossed the border a few times to go talk to the wrong people and help them out. I wonder what he’d do for Mexicans these days.